When You Stop Trusting Yourself: Understanding Perspecticide and Coercive Control

Have you ever found yourself questioning your own memory after an argument? Wondering whether you are overreacting? Apologising when you are not quite sure what you have done wrong? Or asking yourself what your partner would think before forming your own view?

When this happens repeatedly in a controlling relationship, something more significant can occur. Over time, you may start to lose confidence in your own judgment and increasingly rely on your partner's version of events.

The term “perspecticide” is sometimes used to describe this experience.

It is not a legal diagnosis or a term you need to use to describe what has happened to you. But it can provide a useful way of understanding one of the less visible effects of coercive control: the gradual erosion of trust in your own perspective.

What does perspecticide mean?

Perspecticide describes a process in which someone's confidence in their own thoughts, memories and judgment is gradually undermined. It can happen slowly.

Your partner might repeatedly tell you that you are too sensitive, that you remembered something incorrectly, or that an argument was your fault. They may criticise your friends or family until you see less of them. They may monitor where you go, question your decisions, control the finances or make disagreement so difficult that it feels easier simply to agree.  Eventually, you may find yourself changing your behaviour to avoid their reaction.

You might stop raising particular subjects. Stop seeing certain people. Stop making decisions without checking first. You may even begin questioning whether what is happening in the relationship is really as serious as it feels.

Often, there is no single incident that explains this change. It is the accumulation of many behaviours over time that matters.

Is this recognised as family violence?

Australian family law does not use the word “perspecticide”. But that does not mean the behaviour behind it is legally irrelevant.  Section 4AB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) defines family violence to include violent, threatening or other behaviour that coerces or controls a family member or causes them to be fearful. Physical violence is not necessary for behaviour to fall within the definition.

This is important because coercive control does not always look like an obvious act of violence.  It can involve isolation, financial control, repeated humiliation and other behaviour that gradually reduces another person's independence. The legislation includes examples of conduct that may constitute family violence, although the list is not exhaustive.

So you do not need to prove that you have experienced something called “perspecticide”.  What matters is what actually happened, the pattern of behaviour and its effect on you.

Why can it be so difficult to recognise?

One of the difficulties with coercive control is that each incident can seem relatively insignificant when considered by itself.

A disagreement about money.

A criticism about what you are wearing.

Questions about who you have been speaking to.

Another argument after you spend time with your family.

Being told that something did not happen the way you remember it.

Any one event may be capable of explanation. But when the same types of behaviour occur repeatedly, the bigger picture can look very different. The important question may be less about any individual incident and more about what happened to your freedom and independence over time.

Did you start changing your behaviour to keep the peace?

Did you become anxious about disagreeing?

Did your world gradually become smaller?

Did you stop trusting your own decisions?

Did you begin relying on your partner to tell you what was reasonable or true?

Those changes can help explain the impact a controlling relationship has had upon you.

What happens when you separate?

Leaving the relationship does not necessarily make those effects disappear. After years of having your judgment questioned or your independence restricted, suddenly having to make significant decisions for yourself can be overwhelming.  You may be uncertain about what you want. You may minimise things that happened during the relationship. You may worry about how your former partner will react to receiving a lawyer's letter or court documents. You may agree to something you do not really want simply to avoid another confrontation. You may also feel frustrated with yourself for not being more decisive.

But the history of the relationship can provide important context for understanding why decision-making, negotiation and separation feel so difficult. This context may also be relevant in family law proceedings, particularly where the history of the relationship involves coercive or controlling behaviour and issues concerning the safety of children or their carers. The Family Law Act contains specific provisions dealing with family violence in the parenting framework.

How can you start rebuilding the picture?

You do not need to remember everything perfectly.  Sometimes it helps to step away from the question of “Was this abuse?” and start with the simpler question:

“What actually happened?”

If it is safe to do so, looking at contemporaneous records can help.  Messages, emails, financial records, diary entries and communications with people you trusted at the time may help you piece together events without relying solely on memory.

A chronology can also help identify patterns that were difficult to see while you were living through them.

Importantly, you do not need to make everything fit a particular psychological or legal label. The focus should be on what happened, how often it happened, the context in which it occurred and how it affected you.

You do not need the right label to ask for help

Sometimes discovering a term like “perspecticide” can be powerful because it gives language to an experience that has been difficult to explain.  But you do not need to decide whether that label applies to you before seeking advice. You also do not need to have a perfectly organised chronology or a folder full of evidence before speaking with a family lawyer.  If you have reached the point where you no longer trust your own judgment, feel frightened about making decisions independently, or recognise a broader pattern of coercion or control in your relationship, it is worth obtaining advice.

Monica and our family law team regularly assists people affected by family violence and coercive control. We can help you understand which parts of your experience may be legally relevant, how they may affect parenting or property matters, and how to approach the next steps safely and strategically.

 

Previous
Previous

When Money Becomes a Means of Control

Next
Next

When Separation Doesn’t End the Control: Coercive Control, Parenting and Systems Abuse